Cellphones vs. Trucks
Posted by MoreCoffeePlease on 28 Mar 2009 at 10:52 am | Tagged as: Current Events, Toronto
A question I’m pulling out of a comment on another post, from Return of the Bees:
–
Here’s the Highway Traffic Act:
Pedestrian right of way
(28) Every pedestrian who lawfully enters a roadway in order to cross may continue the crossing as quickly as reasonably possible despite a change in the indication he or she is facing and, for purposes of the crossing, has the right of way over vehicles. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 144 (28).
So, the woman proceeding south across Front St. at the Blue Jays Way crossing from the northwest corner to the southwest corner, on a striped pedestrian crosswalk, at ca 9:45 p.m. this week, who proceeded when the light turned green and was run over by the rear wheel of a truck making a right turn presumably into the left lane because of a wide turning base, had the right of way.
Here’s my question RE sidetracking, as with the financial planner (and so much else in life): She was talking on a cell phone, and/but why’s that relevant? All the articles written afterwards about cell phones and iPods are beside the point, which is to say, the cell phone handicapped her, and/but this put her on the same basis as the rest of us handicapped folk–she’d have been squashed just as flat if she was in a wheelchair, deaf, using a white cane, pushing a walker, or… old. Or, even possessed of a simple desire to be “dead right”.
So… Why the fixation on the irrelevant cell phone? Isn’t that getting royally sidetracked?
Why’s everyone evidently reluctant to confirm if the truck driver was proceeding into the intersection against the law?
–
My take on it: I’d normally agree that the cellphone is legally irrelevant, but in this case it does sound like it was the factor that led to her death. From the CBC:
Because she was on her cellphone at the time, police said, she didn’t notice the truck, and walked right into the side of it. She fell to the street and was run over by the truck’s rear wheels, police said.
So if the truck was already in the intersection and turning, the driver cannot in this case be held responsible for the behaviour of a pedestrian who wasn’t in the intersection at the time he began his turn.
As a cyclist I certainly have learned to be very wary of anyone — motorist, pedestrian or cyclist — on a cellphone. They’re oblivious and do the oddest (frequently wildly illegal) things with no warning.
A factor, but not necessarily the factor. Descriptions of the incident (see the Sun: http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2009/03/27/8901391-sun.html) suggest that she may have started to cross on a green light at exactly the same time that the truck turned. This would be a very typical instant of a vehicle illegally rushing a turn that it should wait to make until the intersection is clear. It’s happened to me more than once, when I was not wearing earphones or on a cellphone — the difference for me was the fact that it has been cars doing the same thing rather than trucks that could suck me under. Whether I was on a cellphone or not was not the issue.
Not sure from the description, but it sounds like this, along with several cyclist deaths, was potentially a death that could have been avoided with side guards for trucks.
Traffic fatality #9/2009,
Update,
Man charged
Broadcast time: 08:41
Monday, April 27, 2009
Traffic Services
416−808−1900
On Wednesday, March 25, 2009, at 9:28 a.m., police responded to a personal injury collision
at the intersection of Front Street West/Blue Jays Way.
See previous release.
A 32−year−old man, of Toronto, has been charged with:
1) Fail to Yield to Pedestrian.
He is scheduled to appear in court at Old City Hall, on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 room C, at 9
a.m.
Traffic Services is dedicated to ensuring the safe and orderly movement of traffic within the
City of Toronto. Stay informed with what’s happening at Traffic Services by following us on
Twitter (TrafficServices), and Facebook (Toronto Police – Traffic Services).ig
Glad to see it.
Good.