<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: England expects; or, I cannot answer that question, sir.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171</link>
	<description>Beautiful Soup, so rich and green, Waiting in a hot tureen!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton48</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-778</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an interesting comment thread on a short Guardian online comment about the media coverage of Turney here:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/anne_perkins/2007/03/women_at_war_here_we.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting comment thread on a short Guardian online comment about the media coverage of Turney here:</p>
<p><a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/anne_perkins/2007/03/women_at_war_here_we.html" rel="nofollow">http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/anne_perkins/2007/03/women_at_war_here_we.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawgeek</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>lawgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-760</guid>
		<description>Option 3 is that no training system, no matter how good, is going to be entirely effective against a captor with shall we say a very casual attitude toward the Geneva Convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Option 3 is that no training system, no matter how good, is going to be entirely effective against a captor with shall we say a very casual attitude toward the Geneva Convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gigantichound</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>gigantichound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-757</guid>
		<description>As I said, the other option is her having been betrayed by a defective training system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, the other option is her having been betrayed by a defective training system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Many Quinces</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Many Quinces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-756</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Catus, Dalton and lawgeek. (The Hound and I had a long discussion of this over dinner.) &quot;three meals a day and a constant supply of fluids&quot;?! Who talks like that? Someone being coached on exactly what to say, is who. If you were talking like a normal person you&#039;d say &quot;don&#039;t worry, I have plenty to eat and drink.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And if anyone&#039;s wondering if Stockholm Syndrome could take root after only 3 days, remember that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome&quot; target=&quot;new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the syndrome takes its name from a hostage situation that was only six days long in total.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Catus, Dalton and lawgeek. (The Hound and I had a long discussion of this over dinner.) &#8220;three meals a day and a constant supply of fluids&#8221;?! Who talks like that? Someone being coached on exactly what to say, is who. If you were talking like a normal person you&#8217;d say &#8220;don&#8217;t worry, I have plenty to eat and drink.&#8221; </p>
<p>And if anyone&#8217;s wondering if Stockholm Syndrome could take root after only 3 days, remember that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome" target="new" rel="nofollow">the syndrome takes its name from a hostage situation that was only six days long in total.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatusGabrielis</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>CatusGabrielis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I thought her letter was carefully worded - &quot;fed three meals a day and have a constant supply of fluids&quot;? For all we know, it could be dog food and urine.

Funny how men think circumspect, thoughtful women as weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought her letter was carefully worded &#8211; &#8220;fed three meals a day and have a constant supply of fluids&#8221;? For all we know, it could be dog food and urine.</p>
<p>Funny how men think circumspect, thoughtful women as weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton48</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-754</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with lawgeek -- as is the BBC 
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6503657.stm) 

and the British Foreign Secretary.

As to the comment about whether the woman is an adult or not, II&#039;m not quite sure where that comes from. First of all the language (&quot;compassionate&quot;, &quot;hospitable&quot;) is very adult, as is the wish to keep one&#039;s parents from worrying, and hopes to be home in time for what I assume is a child&#039;s birthday party. Somehow, and I&#039;m *sure* this wasn&#039;t intentional, this post comes across as being somewhat misogynistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with lawgeek &#8212; as is the BBC<br />
(<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6503657.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6503657.stm</a>) </p>
<p>and the British Foreign Secretary.</p>
<p>As to the comment about whether the woman is an adult or not, II&#8217;m not quite sure where that comes from. First of all the language (&#8220;compassionate&#8221;, &#8220;hospitable&#8221;) is very adult, as is the wish to keep one&#8217;s parents from worrying, and hopes to be home in time for what I assume is a child&#8217;s birthday party. Somehow, and I&#8217;m *sure* this wasn&#8217;t intentional, this post comes across as being somewhat misogynistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawgeek</title>
		<link>http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>lawgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.snappingturtle.net/archives/171#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I would want to know more about Iranian methods of persuasion before rushing to judgment here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would want to know more about Iranian methods of persuasion before rushing to judgment here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
