The Battle of Other Milk Solids
Posted by MoreCoffeePlease on 28 Feb 2008 at 11:58 am | Tagged as: Business, Food and Wine
Did you know that there is a pitched battle being waged over the composition of cheese?
Since technological advances have made possible the creation of a whole new generation of milk products (for example, isolates or milk protein concentrates), which are not necessarily subject to tariff quotas and can therefore be imported freely into Canada,(2) how the FDR and the DPR are interpreted clearly has economic implications for industry stakeholders. On a practical level, the use of isolates or imported milk protein concentrates allows cheese processors to reduce their costs, since imported milk protein is typically much cheaper than milk protein originating in Canada. Therefore, it is to the processors’ advantage to rely on the DPR interpretation whereby all milk solids can be used in cheese production, in that this interpretation allows for an increase in low-cost milk protein imports. However, this interpretation puts Canadian dairy producers at a serious economic disadvantage in that a higher level of milk protein imports would result in reduced revenues from milk sales. When cheese processors import milk proteins, the result is lower sales of milk proteins derived from Canadian milk. Canadian milk proteins are thus “displaced” by imports and must be sold off on domestic markets that yield a low return, such as the market for animal feed. This state of affairs translates into major economic losses for Canadian dairy producers. Therefore, strict enforcement of the FDR is very beneficial economically for Canadian dairy producers.
I thought another side of the whole cheese vs. globalization issue was that we did not allow milk producers to use their own milk to make cheese, but that wasn’t mentioned.
Looks like someone found a nifty loophole to get around the quota-coddled dairy farmers, who are somehow unhappy about it. Duh!
It’s kind of a masterpiece of bureaucratic obfuscation — this is really a policy/political argument about whether to accept a de facto partial rollback of the tariff/quota system, but they can’t bring themselves to admit they’re really debating the merits of protectionism, so they get tangled up in discussions about “historic levels of dairy ingredients” in cheese (quite high, I would have hoped, but what do I know?). And you get nonsense like this, a little farther down the link, from the “why can’t we all just get along?” school of dispute resolution:
“While the DIWG was given a relatively broad mandate, one of its main tasks was to help producers and processors reach common ground for paving the way for harmonization of the FDR and the DPR, with an ultimate goal of one consistent interpretation of the regulations by all industry stakeholders.”
A wonky discussion of supply management and trade issues on here and it’s not intitiated by me!
There were a few op-eds over this late last year — here’s one by a dietitian in the Post whose concern is that the new regulations requiring greater % of certain milk solids in cheese could reduce the number of lower-fat cheeses available for sale and restrict the import of some cheeses:
http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=d4d7d17d-feba-4e15-9bc9-4d02c1b36f89&p=2
One of ROB’s columnists has written on this repeatedly (which is why I ever noticed, I guess) — his stuff is all behind a firewall but this one, later published in the Fredericton Daily Gleaner, gives the gist of his objections:
Except for nuclear power, Canada’s dairy industry is perhaps the most intensely regulated industry in the country - and perhaps the most discreetly regulated, too. When the federal government quietly promulgated radical new restrictions on Canada’s cheese-makers in the Canada Gazette, it did so on Boxing Day.
Rest here: http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/search/article/200643
The Dairy Farmers of Canada are declaring victory on this site:
http://www.realcheese.ca/en/index.php